The Bus Factor Challenge in Tech Teams

Imagine a scenario where your lead developer, the one who knows every nook and cranny of your code, gets hit by a bus tomorrow morning. How many people would you have to lose from your team for your project to collapse? This is exactly what the "Bus Factor" measures.

What is the Bus Factor?

The Bus Factor is a term used in the world of software development to designate the minimum number of team members who, if they suddenly became unavailable (the somewhat brutal image being that of being hit by a bus), would jeopardize a project or the continuity of an activity, particularly delivery.

A Bus Factor of 1 means that only one person holds critical, unshared knowledge. This is an extremely risky situation for any project.

Why is this a problem?

The consequences of a low Bus Factor are numerous:

• High operational risk : excessive dependence on a few individuals makes the project vulnerable

• Bottlenecks : Critical decisions and corrections depend on specific people

• Difficulty of integration : new members struggle to understand how the code works

• Potential loss of knowledge : the departure of a key person can lead to the irretrievable loss of know-how

Furthermore, in a team that has its roadmap objectives, if a ticket or a subject requires having skills/knowledge X, Y, Z, we will naturally tend to collectively favor the assignment of this task to someone who already has this knowledge/skills, to take the ticket and move forward more quickly. From time to time, we will think of proposing to pair on the subject, or to document it, in order to make ourselves individually less critical of correcting a bug or evolving the code that will have been produced. However, do we do it often enough to deal with the reality of subjects/skills in bus factor?

How to identify a low Bus Factor?

Here are some telltale signs:

• A person is constantly asked to solve problems

• The code contains areas that no one else understands

• Team members avoid certain parts of the code

• Documentation is sparse or non-existent

• Code reviews are time-consuming, superficial, or nonexistent

Strategies to Increase Your Bus Factor

1. Document knowledge

Documentation is the first line of defense against a low bus factor. It's not just about documenting the code line by line, but about creating an ecosystem of knowledge accessible to the entire team. Quality documentation should detail the overall architecture of the system, explaining how the various components interact with each other. It must also justify the technical choices made, so that future developers understand not only the "how" but also the "why" of the decisions made.

Deployment procedures are particularly critical to document because they often involve complex steps that, if executed incorrectly, can cause service interruptions. Similarly, key use cases should be clearly explained so everyone understands the purpose of the system and can anticipate the impacts of its changes.

2. Promote collective ownership of the code

Code should never be the exclusive domain of one developer. Pair programming is an excellent practice for disseminating knowledge in real time. By working side by side, two developers naturally share their tips, understanding of the system, and problem-solving methods.

Formalized knowledge-sharing sessions complement this approach. These can take the form of workshops where an expert explains a complex section of the code to their colleagues, with practical exercises to consolidate the learning. Task rotation is also essential: each developer should regularly work on different parts of the code, thus avoiding the creation of "knowledge silos."

Code reviews, when conducted rigorously and not as a mere formality, not only improve code quality but also share knowledge among team members. They should include in-depth discussions about the implications of proposed changes.

CI also helps ensure that certain practices are collectively applied. However, they must be properly understood and challenged.

3. Standardize your practices

Standardization reduces reliance on individual knowledge. By adopting consistent coding conventions across the entire codebase, you make it easier for everyone on the team to understand. These conventions should cover naming, file structuring, preferred design patterns, and even commenting style.

Development processes also deserve to be standardized. Whether for integrating new features, fixing bugs, or managing releases, clear and documented processes allow any team member to take over if necessary. Using static code analysis tools helps maintain this consistency by automatically detecting deviations from established standards.

Automation plays a crucial role in reducing the bus factor. Automated testing ensures that knowledge about expected system behavior is encoded into verifiable scripts, while automated deployment eliminates reliance on "magic recipes" known to a single system administrator.

4. Actively train team members

Training shouldn't be left to chance or individual initiative. A structured mentoring program, where experienced developers support less experienced ones, accelerates knowledge transfer. These mentor-mentee relationships should be formalized, with clear objectives and regular sessions.

For newcomers, specific learning paths should be designed, ranging from familiarization with the development environment to understanding the more complex parts of the system. These paths may include recommended reading, practical exercises, and projects of increasing complexity.

Self-training should be encouraged and valued. This could involve allocating time dedicated to exploring the code, experimenting with new approaches, or studying technical documentation. The knowledge thus acquired should be shared, for example, during regular technical presentations where each member can present an aspect of the system that they have studied in depth.

Measure the improvement of the Bus Factor

How do you know if your efforts are paying off? Here are some indicators:

• Task Rotation : Track who is working on which parts of the code

• Problem resolution time : Measure dependence on specific people

• Quality of documentation : Regularly assess its relevance

• Code Reviews : Analyze Contributor Diversity

• Simulation exercises : Test the team's ability to function without its key members

Conclusion

The Bus Factor is often overlooked until it's too late. The Firefox teams and the Linux community have sometimes paid a high price for it. Increasing it should be a priority for any development team concerned about the sustainability of their projects.

Regularly assessing your Bus Factor and taking concrete steps to improve it is not only good risk management practice, it is also an investment in the quality of your code and the well-being of your team.

Don't ask yourself if you should improve your Bus Factor, but rather where to start today.

---

Was this article helpful? Have you ever encountered a Bus Factor issue in your team? Share your experience in the comments!

Create your .dev/ dev passport with your team to discover skills/tech/business knowledge with a low Bus Factor, and solve them through strategic peer learning.